Skip to main content
[thethe-image-slider name="Front page slider"]

Climate Refugees: “The human face of climate change”

Free screening and discussion of Climate Refugees at 6:30 pm, Friday, April 29, at JJR Macleod Auditorium, Medical Sciences Building, I King's College Circle, University of Toronto.

Speakers:

-Laura Westra, Ph.D., Ph.D. (Law)
Recent Publications: Globalization, Violence and World Governance (May 2011)

-Alfredo Barahona, Program Coordinator, Migrant and Indigenous Rights, KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives
Member of the World Council of Churches' Global Ecumenical Network on Migration

-Timothy Leduc, York University
Author of: Climate, Culture, Change (January 2011)   http://climateculturechange.wordpress.com/

About the film:

“Climate Refugees” is an important and timely documentary film that uncovers the unbelievable plight of people around the world displaced by climatically-induced environmental disasters.  The film illuminates -for the first time- the human face of climate change as civilization now finds itself, facing the confluence of overpopulation, lack of resources and a changing climate.

Actor and Sundance Founder, Robert Redford called the film, “an agent for social change.” NY Times

Climate Refugees” was the centerpiece film at the United Nations’ Climate Summit in Copenhagen last December, premiered at the Sundance Film Festival 2010, played at dozens of film festivals around the world to rave reviews, multiple awards and an overwhelming audience response.

“Climate Refugees” is a “resounding wake up call for every human being to go green immediately. It is a must see film that puts the human soul in the science of climate change.” Sherri Quinn, National Public Radio

After traveling the world and interviewing several of the 25 million climate refugees now on the run, along with scholars, politicians and the like, “Climate Refugees” brings to light the heart-wrenching truth of what is quickly becoming mankind’s greatest challenge.

The film examines the creation — and migration — of hundreds of millions of climate refugees that will be displaced as a result of climate change.  A cautionary tale, the film demonstrates that climate change isn’t a political issue; it’s a geopolitical one, one that literally transcends the concepts of nationhood and ethnicity.

“Climate change is the threat multiplier for overpopulation, over-consumption and lack of natural resources. Our mission is to create a platform that will illuminate the facts about climate refugees, their lack of international protection, our national security issues and solutions to these civilization-altering issues,” writer/director/producer Michael Nash.

“Climate Refugees” was filmed in Bangladesh, Belgium, Chad, China, Denmark, Fiji, France, Germany, Holland, Ireland, Kenya, Maldives, Poland, Switzerland, Tuvalu, UK and the US.

?Some high-profile figures featured in the film include:  Senator John Kerry, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Nobel Peace Prize Winner Professor Wangari Maathai, Dr. Rajendra Pachauri (Head of IPCC) and many others.

“With leading researchers and high profile political figures, ‘Climate Refugees’ presents a swell of compelling opinion about the challenges such change puts on the global populations,”Peter Debruge, Variety

For more information please visit us at www.climaterefugees.com

Facebook and Twitter @climaterefugees.com


Study finds organic farms are more energy efficient

Organic farms can be more energy efficient than conventional farms that mass produce crops using unsustainable practices, a surprising result from a study co-authored by a York University professor.

Researchers analyzed 130 studies to compare the energy use and global warming potential of organic versus conventional farming. They concluded that organic farms were more energy efficient on both a per-hectare and per-product basis, with the exception of fruit farming and poultry production, where data is limited.

“These findings shake up the concept that ‘bigger’ is always better. Higher crop yields, bigger equipment, less genetic diversity, and more fertilizer and pesticides do not equal a more energy-efficient operation,” says Rod MacRae (left), a professor in York’s Faculty of Environmental Studies.

Critics of organic farming commonly argue that lower yields make it unsustainable in the long term. “As population increases and land availability decreases, it’s assumed that an ‘assembly line’ approach to agriculture is the only way to keep up with our food needs. While this is the dominant way of thinking, this logic is also deeply flawed,” MacRae says. “For example, many regions in the global south show better yield performance with organic farming. Even in North America, organic yields are not far behind conventional ones.”

MacRae points out that there is an enormous amount of waste in conventional systems. Significant amounts of edible food are lost at harvest, during processing and distribution, at retail and in consumers’ homes. “By some accounts, up to 40 per cent of what gets farmed never makes it to our mouths, and this adds enormously to energy waste. This can result in the perception that we’re not producing enough food,” he says.

Studies of conventional and organic grain growers in the prairie region showed significant benefits for organic methods, including 50 per cent lower energy use in a 12-year study of forage and grain crop rotations. The absence of nitrogen fertilizer was a main contributor to reduced energy inputs and greater efficiency. Modelling studies of a Canada-wide conversion to organic canola, wheat, soybean and corn concluded we would consume 39 per cent less energy and generate only 77 per cent of the global warming emissions and 17 per cent of ozone-depleting emissions of conventional wheat farming.

Above: Organic cultivation of mixed vegetables

In terms of dairy farming, a study in Atlantic Canada found that an organic, seasonal grazing system was 64 per cent more energy efficient and emitted 29 per cent less greenhouse gases compared with the average of conventional systems. Cows consuming an organic diet may also have a longer lifespan, increasing efficiency and reducing methane emissions when calculated over time.

Where livestock is concerned, fewer studies exist and comparisons are more difficult because of dramatic differences in operations from farm to farm, particularly for hogs and poultry. Conventionally raised beef is widely accepted as the least environmentally friendly meat, requiring seven times as many inputs for an equivalent output of calories. Organic beef production is considered to be more efficient because the animals consume more grass and less grain than humans can consume.

The study, “The Carbon and Global Warming Potential Impacts of Organic Farming: Does It Have a Significant Role in an Energy Constrained World?” was published in the journal Sustainability. Its lead author is Professor Derek Lynch, Department of Plant & Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College.

From the Tuesday, April 12th edition of YFile.



York releases its second annual sustainability report

The President’s Sustainability Council today released its Sustainability Report for 2010, in conjunction with Earth Hour on Saturday, March 26.

The 2010 Sustainability Report, which highlights York’s commitment to sustainability on its campuses, profiles the University’s efforts to function in an environmentally and socially sustainable manner over the past year.

"I would like to thank the Sustainability Council for all of their hard work throughout the year,” says York President & Vice-Chancellor Mamdouh Shoukri. “We are a university that is committed to enhancing our environmentally and socially responsible practices, for the benefit of all members of the York community.”

Jennifer Foster, chair of the President’s Sustainability Council, added, “The work of the council continues to provide the foundation for York’s sustainability efforts. York has already made great strides in being recognized as a Campus Sustainability Leader in the 2010 College Sustainability Report Card, and by the many initiatives on our campuses, including our Res Race to Zero.”

In the report, the council says it finds "considerable progress in York’s standing in relation to the three pillars of sustainability. York continues to lead the way in innovative yet contextually-specific approaches to building an ecologically resilient, economically robust and socially just institution."

At the same time, says the report, "the council finds that there is opportunity to continue enhancing a pan-University strategy with new recommendations that expand and deepen York’s commitment to sustainability."

To view the full report, please click here or visit www.yorku.ca/susweb.


York team wins second in TD GO Green Challenge

A sustainability project by two York students to revitalize the forest surrounding the Glendon campus has garnered second place in the fourth annual TD Go Green Challenge. The students, one from each of York University’s two campuses, combined their vision and collaborated on the project – “The Future of Our Forest: A Sustainability Vision for York University” – which included a video detailing their idea.

Right: From left, Glendon Principal Kenneth McRoberts, TD FEF regional manager Farzana Syed, Caitlin Langlois Greenham, Darnel Harris and FES Dean Barbara Rahder with the students' TD GO Green Challenge prize cheque

The second-place team of fourth-year Glendon history student Darnel Harris and masters of environmental studies student Caitlin Langlois Greenham, of the Faculty of Environmental Studies (FES) at the Keele campus, received a cheque for $15,000 presented by Farzana Syed, regional manager of TD Friends of the Environment Foundation (TD FEF), at Glendon on March 16.

Glendon College also received a $15,000 cheque, which will go towards making some of the project’s goals a reality as it is designated for planting trees in the Glendon forest.

“The judges were very impressed with how well this team articulated the challenge they presented, as well as the creativity, practicality and innovation of their suggested solutions,” said Natasha Alleyne-Martin, TD FEF manager of national programs.

Some 132 teams from 59 Canadian post-secondary schools participated in this year’s TD FEF Go Green Challenge, a national competition, which focused on sustainability and environmental stewardship on campus. The ideas ranged from paperless universities to an integrated energy and food greenhouse.

Above: The video detaling the second place TD FEF GO Green Challenge winning project by York students Darnel Harris and Caitlin Langlois Greenham

Top honours went to a team of students from McGill University, who will be awarded $20,000 and a paid 2011 summer internship with TD FEF for each student team member, while $100,000 will go to McGill University for greening the campus. Third place went to a team from the University of Victoria, who will receive a $10,000 prize and a $10,000 grant to support on-campus tree-planting initiatives.

The York team’s video outlines the challenge facing the forest around the Glendon campus, currently in a state of degradation because of overuse. It is one of the few remaining wetlands, a home to globally rare amphibians in Toronto, and an essential part of the Don Valley corridor that connects it to habitats downstream. The team proposed a four-step solution to restore the forest’s role in ecological, educational and social vitality.

Left: Farzana Syed (left), Kenneth McRoberts and Barbara Rahder hold cheque for Glendon tree-planting project

“We are all great beneficiaries of the Glendon forest, a part of our campus landscape that is close to all our hearts. We are dedicated to preserving this magnificent campus, originally built and developed by the Wood family in the 1920s, and we are delighted to receive the funds for this project,” said Glendon Principal Kenneth McRoberts.

“Environmental degradation ranks as one of the greatest challenges for our society”, said Professor Barbara Rahder, dean of York’s Faculty of Environmental Studies. “Our students remind us that a more sustainable future is possible and begins at the grassroots level, with small but innovative ideas….This is just one of our areas of strength here at York….in fact, this is the second time in just four years that York students have finished at the top of this competitive contest. TD has demonstrated a deep commitment to the advancement of York University, to the sustainability of our surrounding communities and to the conservation and protection of our collective environment. “

The two winners expressed their profound thanks to TD FEF for its generous support and emphasized the collaborative nature of the project. They also paid tribute to the team’s behind-the-scenes contributors, including Alex Lisman’s videography, Micky Rodriguez’s music composition, the crew at Regenesis@York, the President’s Sustainability Council and its student subcommittee.

Right: The Regenesis@York team with the prize

“Our team is passionate about Glendon’s forest, an ecological gem containing multiple forest biomes, an endangered wetland, and a river, in the heart of the city,” said Harris, who is also co-president of Regenesis@York, a student organization dealing with sustainability projects on both of York’s campuses. “My love for the forest led me to notice its degraded state and I began to investigate what could be done to improve the situation. Finding Caitlin, someone of like passion, and working together was indeed a blessing.”

Langlois Greenham said: “As a lifelong environmental advocate, I know the transformative value of community-based stewardship projects, and having grown up not far from Glendon, I feel closely connected to the forests here, as do so many others. This project will revitalize the forest and the entire Don River Valley habitat corridor, reconnect people with natural spaces, and raise awareness about the importance of urban nature and the value of stewarding the environment around us.”

FES Professor Jennifer Foster, chair of the President’s Sustainability Council, was the faculty advisor for the project.

For more information about the winning teams and their projects, visit TD GO Green website

Submitted by Marika Kemeny, Glendon communications officer


Session with Patrick Bond on Civil Society and COP17

The People's Assembly on Climate Justice, in collaboration with the Science For Peace, invites you to an initial briefing session on civil society preparations for COP 17 in Durban at the end of this year.

This briefing session will be conducted by Patrick Bond, Director of the Centre for Civil Society in Durban, South Africa, which is currently working on organizing events and activities.

When: Thursday, March 31, 10am to 12pm

Where: OISIE, 252 Bloor Street West, Room 2296.

Space is limited so please RSVP to Brett Rhyno, 647-869-6496 or peoplesassembly.toronto@gmail.com


Reconsidering Ontario’s Nuclear Path – Published in the Toronto Star

This blog was originally published on Professor Mark Winfield's blog.

The unfolding nuclear catastrophe in Japan has reopened the debate about the role of nuclear power around the world, including here in Ontario. The provincial government’s December 2010 “Long-Term Energy Plan” proposes to maintain a commitment to an electricity system that relies on nuclear power for 50 per cent of its output. Nuclear’s contribution would come through a combination of building new plants, and refurbishing existing facilities as they reach their normal end-of-life.

The viability of the government’s plans on the nuclear front were already subject to serious doubts even before the disaster in Japan. Ontario has a long history of major cost-overruns and delays on nuclear construction and refurbishment projects. The province’s bidding process for two build reactors at Darlington produced proposals whose costs, at between $23 and $26 billion, were between three and four times higher than the Ontario Power Authority’s original estimates. The outcome prompted the province to terminate its procurement process in June 2009. These experiences have led many to suggest that the $33 billion nuclear cost estimate to replace or refurbish the province’s entire fleet of reactors in the government’s Long-Term Energy Plan is wildly optimistic.

Moreover, there are very serious questions about the ability of either of the proponents who filed bids under the 2009 process to deliver viable new proposals in the foreseeable future. Areva of France has suffered a number of difficulties, particularly with respect to its reactor construction project in Finland. Atomic Energy of Canada, for its part, has been put up for sale by the federal government. It is not clear that the company will even exist in any recognizable form a year from now.

Questions about the future role of nuclear in the system have not been limited to the usual ‘green’ suspects. The province’s Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO)has been commenting for some time on the presence of ‘surplus baseload generation’ (read nuclear) in the system, particularly in the context of declining and less stable demand.

Nuclear supporters argue that Ontario has no viable option but to remain dependent on nuclear power, apparently regardless of whatever challenges of cost, safety, reliability, security and waste management exist or may emerge. In reality, considerable effort has gone into exploring electricity options for Ontario that involve significant reductions or even phase-outs of nuclear power as the existing fleet of plants reaches its normal end of life over the next two decades. The most detailed work began with the 2004 Power for the Future study by the Pembina Institute (http://www.pembina.org/pub/166) and has been followed up with the Renewable is Doable initiative (http://www.renewableisdoable.com/). In both cases the nuclear and coal-phase out options, relying on increased efforts on electricity conservation and demand management, and larger roles for low-impact renewable energy sources like wind and solar, and combined heat and power (cogeneration) facilities, emerged as viable, and economically and environmentally superior to the nuclear based plans proposed by the province. These findings were based on what we now know were very conservative (i.e. low) assumptions about nuclear costs, based on the OPA’s estimates before the outcomes of the new build bidding process and the recent refurbishment projects were known. Similarly, the modeling accepted the Ontario Power Authority’s assumptions regarding the growth of future demand. In practice, electricity demand in Ontario has turned out to be in decline, and is not projected by the IESO to increase significantly anytime before the end of the decade.

The federal environmental assessment process for a Darlington new build reactor project, for which public hearings are scheduled to begin next week, is especially poorly configured to explore the questions that need to be answered before Ontario commits to further nuclear construction or refurbishment projects. The key issues about the role and need for nuclear energy in the province’s electricity system have been ‘scoped’ out of the hearing. Any exploration of safety issues is hampered by the consideration that, given that the proponent and nature of the reactor design that will be employed are still unknown, the assessment is ‘generic’ rather than focused on any specific type of reactor.

So far the province has hidden behind the federal process rather than permitting a meaningful environmental review of its own plans. That needs to change in light of the developments of the past few days. Other jurisdictions are reconsidering their nuclear plans in light of the Japanese disaster. Ontario needs to do the same, and initiate a serious public exploration of the options for the future of the province’s electricity system.


The 4th Revolution

Where: York University at Nat Taylor Cinema
When: March 23,2011
Time: 4-8 pm
Price: FREE
Light refreshments will be served

There will be a movie showing of the 4th Revolution. For more information, please take a look at the poster:

The4thRevMoviePoster4[1]


Response to “Keep building nuclear plants” Globe and Mail

This blog was originally published on Professor Mark Winfield's blog. 

March 19, 2011

The Editors
The Globe and Mail
444 Front St.
Toronto, Ontario

Dear Sir/Madam

Re: “Keep building nuclear plants” (March 19, 2011)

A team of researchers from York University and the University of Waterloo recently undertook a sustainability assessment of the major electricity supply options available to Ontario, including nuclear, coal, natural gas (conventional and unconventional), a range of renewables, and energy conservation and demand management. The study employed criteria related to social, economic and biophysical impacts, the distribution of risks and impacts in the present and future, resiliance and adaptive capacity, and democratic governance. The major conclusions, published in the leading international journal Energy Policy last August, were that nuclear and coal preformed equally poorly, although for different reasons. Greenhouse Gas emissions, air pollution and permanent upstream landscape distrubance emerged as key considerations for coal, while accident, cost, security and weapons proliferation risks, along with extemely hazardous and long-lived up and downstream waste streams were the critical challenges for nuclear. In the result, neither offers an attractive option for environmentally and economically sustainable global energy supplies in the long-term.

In contrast, energy consevation and demand management performed extremely well on all criteria. Renewables also performed well, with some variation depending on the specific technologies. This is good news, as it highlights the potential to avoid the no-win nuclear vs. coal trade-off, particularly given the very high energy intensity of emerging economies like those of India and China and consequent potential for major efficiency gains. Moreover, last year more power capacity was added in the United States and Europe from renewable energy sources than coal, nuclear, oil and natural gas combined. Rapid growth in renewables is occuring developing economies as well, where serious questions exist about whether large centralized electricity systems represent the best way to meet the energy needs of their citizens.

The Japanese nuclear disaster has renewed the debate of the best path to global energy sustainability. Unfortunately the kind of emotional, ‘we have no choice but nuclear’ nihilism suggested by Doug Saunders’ article does little to contribute to the debate.


CAPs Conference

When: March 22, 2011, 4:30 pm

Where: Room 701 South Ross, York University

At the event, the Urban Studies students will present the highlight of the Canadian Association of Planning Students' 2011 Conference which took place in Waterloo. The students and guess speakers debated around the theme 'Resilience', which could become a new and real direction in the future planning of urban areas and the way we live. The presentation will also include a reflection on the annual field trips to Buffalo organized by the Urban Studies program and other information about the program and the Federation of Urban Studies Students.


css.php