Skip to main content
[thethe-image-slider name="Front page slider"]

Yfile: Res Race to Zero saves more than 31,000 kilowatt hours

The following appeared in the Friday, April 16, 2010 edition of Y-File:

Simple steps mean a lot when it comes to climate change.

During the month of March, students in eight undergraduate residences on Keele campus and two on the Glendon campus took many simple steps as part of a collective effort to reduce their personal energy consumption.

The students were competing in York University’s second annual Res Race to Zero challenge, which saw students in the 10 residences work together to reduce their personal carbon footprint, and in turn, that of their residence. Led by 9 residence environmental ambassadors, the 2,500 students competed against each other and tried, in true competitive spirit, to bring home a personal best with respect to energy saved.

Right: Residence Environmental
Ambassadors leading the Res Race to
Zero challenge are, clockwise from
the bottom, Farrahnaz Bulsara,
Madeline Neff, Adellah Chimbindi,
Jason Vuu, Yulia Lobacheva, James
Marzotto and Ives Spritzer

“I’m sure the students must have been living in the dark or studying by candlelight,” joked Helen Psathas, York’s senior manager of environmental design & sustainability.

After crunching the numbers, Psathas revealed that the energy saved by month’s end amounted to 31,029 kilowatt hours (kWh), or enough energy to power the 13-floor Vanier Residence for one month. The measurement of energy consumption during the challenge for each residence building included the average kilowatt usage per person by residence as compared with last year's Res Race to Zero student competitors. The final tally equals a decrease across the University of 5.40 per cent or a reduction of 8.89 kWh per person over March 2009.

On Friday, April 9, Psathas and York Vice-President Students Rob Tiffin visited Winters Residence to award the first prize to not one, but two residences. The students of Winters Residence and Bethune Residence on the Keele campus achieved the most significant reductions in energy consumption.

"It is really delightful to be here today," said Psathas. "Two years ago, we started Res Race to Zero and the real story is about the collective efforts of York students. Last year's winner Calumet Residence had very good results and we were sure the students were living in the dark, so you can imagine my delight when the results surpassed last year's totals. All of the undergrad residences did very well."

"Let me just add my personal congratulations to Bethune and Winters," said Tiffin. "A survey done [recently] by the Rockefeller Institute that looked at green initiatives across North America and York received a B+, which was the highest mark.

"Four years ago, York established a Sustainability Council and that has grown into the President's Advisory Committee on Sustainability, so sustainability very much on the minds of all of us at York University. Congratulations to you all, well done!" said Tiffin.

On hand to receive the awards were Bethune Residence environmental ambassador Lani Etzkorn and Winters Residence green don Coni Davila. The $2,000 award will be split between the two winning residences. Students living in Bethune Residence achieved a reduction of 17.82 kWh per person over statistics from one year ago, while students living in Winters Residence achieved a reduction of 14.70 kWh per person over the same period one year ago.

Above: Res Race to Zero challenge winners receive their plaques
from York VP Students Rob Tiffin. From left, Lani Etzkorn,Bethune
 
Residence environmental ambassador; Rob Tiffin; and Coni Davila,
Winters Residence green don.

The decision was made to share the prize due to unforeseen circumstances – a three-day power outage in Bethune. Winning residences are considering options such as low-flow showerheads, which will be funded by the $2,000 prize.

For the first time, residences on York's Glendon campus participated in the challenge and demonstrated their energy reduction efforts from Week 1 to Week 4. Hilliard Residence, which has 215 rooms, saw a weekly consumption per person drop by 1.31 kWh and the 189-room Wood Residence by 2.25 kWh per person. This data will serve as a benchmark for next year's competition.

Res Race to Zero complements York's Energy Management Program, a five-year plan to reduce energy consumption by 25 per cent. For more information and to view the competition’s statistics, visit Yorkwise, the event sponsor, or the Res Race to Zero Web site.


Road Pricing & Leadership Summit (June 18)

Congestion charging. Priced networks. High Occupancy Toll Lanes.

These road pricing systems are being implemented internationally in order to fight traffic congestion, reduce pollution and generate dedicated revenues for sustainable transportation infrastructure. Yet, when the discussion begins, road tolls are usually described as “controversial”, “audacious”, “explosive” and even “radioactive”. A recent Ontario poll has confirmed the findings of many other domestic and international opinion surveys: the majority of citizens yearn for a much improved transportation network to serve their needs but are reluctant to pay for it in a direct manner.

With the help of our delegates and partners, Transport Futures has been exploring this conundrum since our inaugural forum in November 2008. Now a perfect storm of economic, social and environmental challenges compels us to continue our non-partisan discussion by examining the critical role of leadership and road pricing. In order to get insights from the front lines, we have invited these prominent politicians from across North America:

- Bruce Starr, Senator & Chair, Road User Fee Task Force, Oregon State Legislature, Oregon
- Melissa Mark-Viverito, Council Member, New York City Council, New York
- Peter Fassbender, Mayor, City of Langley & Chair, TransLink Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation, BC
- Emil Kolb, Chair, Peel Region, Ontario
- Gilles Bisson, MPP & Transportation Critic, Ontario New Democratic Party
- Frank Klees, MPP & Transportation Critic, Ontario Progressive Conservative Party
- Peter Milczyn, Councillor, City of Toronto, Ontario

These elected officials, along with five others to be confirmed soon, have agreed to answer a broad range of road pricing questions, including:

- Why do they support road pricing in the face of widespread opposition? Why not?
- How do they communicate road pricing benefits and/or costs to their constituents?
- What can we learn from their varied experiences?

Don’t miss this unique opportunity to hear first-hand how American politicians have “taken the heat” for adding road pricing to their transportation tool kit – and from Canadian politicians who are (or aren't) considering them.

Spaces are limited! Register today and take advantage of our early bird rates!

The Transport Futures Road Pricing and Leadership Summit is taking place at The Metropolitan Hotel in downtown Toronto, conveniently located just behind Toronto City Hall.

For further information about our exciting program, please visitwww.transportfutures.ca or send an email to info@transportfutures.ca . Alternatively, feel free to phone Anthony at 647-340-2082.


Yfile: Greening York: Zero Waste is coming to your office

The following appeared in the Thursday, April 22, 2010 edition of Y-File:

It's Earth Day and York University is launching Zero Waste, a new campaign to reduce the amount of trash produced by the University that goes into landfill. Comprised of two initiatives, Zero Waste is designed to help the University recycle more of its waste and stop harmful cleaning chemicals from entering the environment.

Above: A concept of what York's waste disposal trucks will look like once Zero Waste is fully implemented

Each year in North America, more than 6.2 billion pounds of cleaning chemicals and 36 billion plastic garbage can liners are consumed. Many of these are manufactured using petroleum products and have an enduring negative impact on the biosphere.

Zero Waste is York’s effort to reduce its institutional footprint. The campaign builds on two successful pilots that were launched in the York Research Tower last August, in which building occupants managed their own recycling and trash disposal, and "green" cleaning products were introduced. (See YFile, Aug. 13, 2009.)

Starting Monday, June 7, custodial staff will no longer service office waste and recycling bins. Instead York community members will tote their own trash and recycling to communal tri-bins (three-sectioned recycling bins) located in common areas. Each kitchenette will also be equipped with a small green bin for organics.

Currently, recycled materials at York’s Keele campus account for 59 per cent of the institution’s total waste, and the goal for Zero Waste is to reach 65 per cent by 2013. “This equals more than 200 metric tonnes of diverted waste over a year, which is comparable to stopping 10 large transport trucks fully loaded with waste from heading off to the landfill,” says Bob Smith, director of custodial, grounds and Glendon Facilities Services for Campus Services & Business Operations (CSBO).

Zero Waste relies on University community members taking responsibility for the recyclables and waste that they generate during the day. To make the campaign work, the tri-bin and green cleaning initiative launched in the research tower will expand to all of the 90 buildings on the Keele campus. That means giving up individual office garbage collection in favour of communal tri-bins; using kitchenette organic collection bins (which will be inspected daily and serviced as required) for lunch leftovers; and the roll-out across the University of green cleaning products.

With the start of Zero Waste, those black desk-side waste bins in offices and work areas will no longer be outfitted with a plastic liner. Everyone will be encouraged to take their unused drinks, soggy tea bags and leftover sandwiches to the common kitchens. Organic waste will go into kitchen collectors or to outside digesters. This initiative alone will save more than 30,000 plastic bags from going into the landfill, says Smith.

Zero Waste has numerous benefits for both the University and the environment. The program not only saves money, it also frees custodial staff from emptying thousands of individual desk-side garbage and recycling containers. The time saved will then be redirected to dusting and cleaning work surfaces, carpets, kitchenettes and bathrooms – a win-win for air quality, health and the environment.

“Every time you use a tri-bin properly you save the University money,” says Smith. “If we all participate in the Zero Waste initiative, our custodial employees will spend more time cleaning, which will lead to improved air quality in your work environment.”

Under the green cleaning program, custodial staff will use Green Seal products such as vacuums with HEPA filtration technology and GEL Cell batteries, which have a longer life and reduced off gassing for better air quality. They will also use the same environmentally responsible cleaning products that are used to keep the research tower spotless. These products are much less corrosive, with fewer airborne (volatile) contaminants, compared to traditional formulations such as bleach. The enzymes they contain continue to destroy unwanted germs for a longer period of time, which translates into a cleaner environment and reduced product usage.

You can help the program reach its goal by doing the following:

- Dispose of your organics into the NEW organic bin located in all kitchenettes.
- Do not put organics in your office waste bin.
- Keep in mind that your office garbage will no longer be collected, and empty your office recycling and waste bins into centrally located tri-bins.

You can also help the University be successful by making sure that all of your waste is placed in the appropriate tri-bin section:

- newspaper and office paper (not including used paper coffee cups or plates) will go into one section of the tri-bin;
- cans, bottles and other minor plastics, including plastic forks, plastic bags and bottles that have been emptied of any liquid, will go into another section of the tri-bin;
- wrappers and packaging that are soiled with food waste or not recyclable should go into the waste section of the tri-bin;
- all organic waste goes into a separate kitchennette bin or digester.

A waste-less lunch that makes use of reusable containers and a coffee mug will go a long way to reducing trips to the tri-bins and kitchenettes. Everyone is also encouraged to take advantage of York's other recycling options.

By printing on both sides of the paper and reusing office paper for note taking, York community members have also been doing their part to reduce their use of some of the 4.5 billion pounds of paper products created from 30 million trees.


Student Rate for GHG Inventory Workshop – ISO 14064 Standard

Save $ 550
Students -

A block of seats is being held aside for students at $ 100/ seat for this "Measuring and Reporting your Carbon Footprint Workshop" at Pinchin Environmental in Mississauga. Sorry about the expense, but it does include a "binder" with all reference materials, lunch, breaks and parking.

We will follow the ISO 14064 GHG standard and GHG Protocol Intiative. It is interesting that a "Growing numbers of businesses are expected to adopt a "shadow price" for carbon when making infrastructure decisions. The budgets will include a "shadow spot price" for carbon, which will be used to determine emissions costs for future design, construction and maintenance of its electricity and gas networks, management of its fleet and facilities, and any potential new investments."

All you need to do is go to: http://ghgmeasurement.eventbrite.com and click on Discount under the box that shows the pricing. You can then type in the discount code: Student

Measuring & Reporting your Carbon (GHG) Footprint Workshop

Date: May 12, 2010
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Student Rate: $ 100
Regular Registration Rate: $ 650

In a carbon constrained world, is your organization ready for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) measurement and reporting?

GHG reporting is already a requirement for large emitters (power plants) in Canada and in the U.S.  Increasingly Canadian companies are conducting internal GHG inventories to understand their "carbon risk" and to report to shareholders or customers like Wal-Mart.

Do you know how many tonnes of Greenhouse Gases your company generates through direct and indirect emissions? Are your customers or shareholders among the increasing majority requiring the reporting of  your GHG emissions?  Are they asking to see the  reduction plan?  

In this "hands-on" workshop you will work on the development of your GHG inventory and management plan.  You will learn about greenhouse gases and their effect on the environment and international and national efforts to reduce GHG emissions.  By the end of this workshop you will be able to develop your company's GHG management plan and understand how to quantify, report and verify your total GHG emissions.

Register Here

"Kick Start" your GHG Inventory in this Workshop

Using current case studies, best practice examples and hands-on activities you will:

· Understand the effects of GHG's on the planet and international efforts to reduce GHG's.
· Make the business case for GHG measurement, management and reporting.
· Appraise the principles of ISO 14064 and this standard's use in GHG measurement, management, reporting and verification.
· Apply direct GHG emission accounting to your operations and do GHG calculations for your direct (scope 1) and indirect (scope 2) emissions.
· Comprehend indirect GHG emission accounting and identify the other indirect (scope 3) GHG emissions in your operation.
· Discuss GHG quantification methodologies and their implications to your reporting and verification system.
· List options for GHG reduction including mitigation and offset strategies. Identify steps to ISO 14064 GHG verification processes.
· Create a plan of action for GHG Management for your enterprise.

Internationally Recognized GHG Workshop Leader

Hicham Elhalaby, M.Eng., P. Eng., Manager, Climate Change GHG,
Pinchin Environmental Ltd.

Hicham is the Manager of the Climate Change Group at Pinchin Environmental. He is currently instructing the ISO 14064 part 1 course and is leading the development of GHG inventories for national and multinational companies, including Canada's largest wireless voice and data communications services provider.  He is currently a Member of the Canadian Advisory Committee to ISO TC 207 Sub-committee 7 responsible for the development of ISO 14064 Greenhouse Gas standards. He is also advising a group of international investors on a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project to generate 450,000 tons of Certified Emission Reduction (CER) units annually.

At Pinchin, Hicham has led the analysis of the inventory design, data handling and monitoring systems in accordance with the GHG Protocol and ISO Standards. Hicham also has extensive international project management experience related to development, environmental and GHG reduction projects. Prior to joining Pinchin, he was the manager of the CIDA-funded Climate Change Initiative fund and the Environmental Initiatives Fund. He is also an associate environmental auditor with the British Environmental Auditing Association.

Register Here

About Sustainability Learning Centre

The Sustainability Learning Centre is a social enterprise dedicated to helping companies achieve competitive advantage through sustainable business practices.

Check out our website at : www.sustainabilitylearningcentre.com

Call us at : 519-855-9491


Greening Sacred Spaces Toronto Animator Job Posting

Job Posting: Community Animator (Toronto area)

Faith & the Common Good is a national non-profit organization that facilitates inter-faith dialogue and action on matters of social and ecological concern. Our main program, Greening Sacred Spaces (GSS), promotes eco-sustainability in faith communities (churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, etc.), focusing primarily on energy
conservation within faith buildings. We are looking for half-time staff (approximately 75 hours/month) to liaise with green activists within faith communities to assist them in
participating in GSS.

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
 
- Experience working with faith communities
- Knowledge and understanding of environmental issues and eco-sustainable solutions
- Experience with networking 
- Experience with working with volunteers
- Experience and comfort speaking in front of groups
- Must be creative, energetic, flexible, motivated, and well-organized

DUTIES
-  Conduct all activities in accordance with the ecological and spiritual mission of Faith & the Common Good
-  Plan and coordinate the ‘Greening Sacred Spaces’ program in the local area
-  Identify and liaise with representatives from each faith community and report on activities
-  Plan and participate in GSS networking events
-  Animate interest in the campaign among faith communities and other groups
- Track local environmental resources and liaise with community and environmental groups for opportunities to collaborate.
- Liaise with other environmental groups regional networks.

For more information please refer to the attached poster.


CLPE Lecture, Dr. Usha Ramanathan, New Delhi, India (May 11)

COMPARATIVE RESEARCH IN LAW
AND POLITICAL ECONOMY NETWORK and the NATHANSON CENTRE
are proud to invite Students and Faculty to attend a CLPE Lecture by:

Dr. Usha Ramanathan
“Legality and Legitimacy: The Development Project and Mass Displacement”

Time: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 12:30-2:00
Location: Ross S839

Lunch will be served

Dr. Usha Ramanathan is an independent law researcher based in New Delhi, India, who writes and speaks on the jurisprudence of law, poverty and rights. Her work moves around and between constitutionalism, human rights, marginalisation, the law's continuums, and the judicial process. Specific areas of her work include displacement projects, corporate accountability, questions of liberty, power, control and authority of the state and judicial power. Her work draws heavily upon non-governmental experience in its encounters with the state, a 6 year stint with a law journal as reporter from the Supreme Court, engagement as a contributing expert with institutions including the WHO (2003-07), the International Commission of Jurists (2006-08), Amnesty International (2004-07) and Rights and Democracy, Canada (2004-06). Some of her writings can be found at http://www.ielrc.org/.

Abstract: Dams, industry, roads, mining: these are among the constituents of the development project. Since the mid-1980s, displacement has become a central theme in development discourses. Resistance and protest from amongst project affected populations, and challenges to the model of development have escalated. Resettlement policies, and coming down on protesters, have been among the responses to movements and civil society action against projects that displace, or corporatise resources. Environmental concerns, and politics, are part of the amalgam. Institutions, including the judiciary, and international financial institutions, have had significant spaces that they have occupied.

An idea of legality, and legitimacy, emerges from this cauldron of activity, concerns and resistance.

RSVP please to Joanne Rappaport (jrappaport@osgoode.yorku.ca)


The City of Toronto’s 20-minute Makeover

On Friday, April 24th, 2010, IRIS had the opportunity to participate in the City of Toronto’s 20-minute Makeover at York University. This makeover was a celebratory event for Earth Day and marked York’s commitment to campus sustainability. We went to the Danby Woods by Chimneystack Road to clean up one of the woodlots on campus.

[photopress:DSC_0030_3.JPG,full,alignright][photopress:DSC_0032_2.JPG,full,alignright][photopress:DSC_0031_3.JPG,full,alignright]

The group found a wide range of dumped objects in all kinds of materials, mostly fabric, plastic and paper products.  We also found a hidden “dump site” – a place where people seem to cover their garbage with leaves and branches. The group dug most of the garbage out from the mound. Disposable food and drink packages were the majority of the waste collected there. Some of the packages had already started decomposing when we dug them out. However, we found that even for paper packages, there was still a certain amount of material that is not biodegradable—at least in the short run. For example, Tim Hortons cups contain a thin layer of plastic protection inside the cup that takes longer to decompose than the paper component of the cup. Even once the outside paper layer is gone, the inside layer was still be present in cups that we found.

I think the whole process of participating in this activity is fairly educational. One might never notice how much waste material we have around us unless we take a serious look. Within twenty minutes, IRIS and other groups picked up seven bags of garbage including an unwanted kid cart. I was amazed by the result and the effort we can make to perfect our environment within only 20 minutes! Waste and disposable materials are a serious problem to consider. Instead of focusing purely on academic perspective, we should put our theory into practice. We should pay more attention to our living environment and protect the earth by contributing small daily tasks such as picking up some garbage. If we work together and show that we care, we can make a huge difference together.


Climate Change: Women’s Voices from the Global South

[photopress:Climate_wise_women.jpg,full,centered]

Last week, IRIS attended the Climate Wise Women (CW2) to listen to the experiences of three women from the Global South who are already living with the impacts of climate change. After the failure of COP15 to reach a binding accord, a group of women from the Global South, began a worldwide speaking tour. Their objective is share their stories and to spur climate action at the grassroots level. This well put together public speaking tour offers an alternative narrative on how climate change affects women and families.  Ulamila Kurai Wragg from the Cook Islands focused on how traditional knowledge, inheritance structures, and livelihoods are changing forever.  The community has found that traditional crops can no longer flourish, fish have migrated away from the shores near home, and local water reserves are now saline. Ulamila's family has adapted by changing crops, by collecting rain water whenever possible, and by walking to fishing grounds on the other side of the Island. However, resource yields have fallen and the pressure to seek other livelihood options looms for her daughters. Ulamila’s message was that traditional ways of life and cultural practices have already changed due to climate change. Sharon Hanshaw from Biloxi, Mississippi told us a tragic story of personal loss and community displacement after Hurricane Katrina. Her message was that politicians have turned a blind eye to most vulnerable victims of the Hurricane, and in response women have gathered to place political pressure on the local government to rebuild what was lost.  Finally, Constance Okollet from Uganda told a gripping tale about the impacts of the 2007 flooding and subsequent droughts on the agricultural community of Tororo. She recounted the stories of the deaths of children and elders to cholera and malaria during the floods, and then the further losses due to malnutrition as the drought came.  Just as the community began to recover, another intense flood and drought followed in 2009. Her message was that the community has never seen such an intensity and frequency of both droughts and floods. She emphasized how her community fears only the worst for their future and survival. The presentation pointed to how local people are living with the impacts of climate change, and offered the space for understanding climate impacts and responses across gender and cultures.

Learn more at: http://www.climatewisewomen.org/


Eyjafjallajokull: Necessity is the mother of green invention?

This morning’s episode of CBC’s ‘The Current’ featured the sounds of birds singing in West London. A newsworthy event, since no one knows if the birds sing everyday. On most days, the songs are drowned out by the ever present droning of jet engines overhead. Local residents interviewed commented both on how nice the sounds of nature are, and how refreshing silence can be in the city. A radical idea: nature is part of the city and contributes to our well being. Elsewhere, the British Navy has sent ships to take stranded travelers home; others have taken trains home. And for those whose travel plans have been canceled, they are opting to go local by taking trips to the countryside.  A radical idea: we can relax close to home, and we can move across Europe by train, boat, and not plane.  Business is adapting as well, with the grounding of employees on their way to meetings, conferences, and presentations, business is replacing travel with video conferencing.  Another radical idea: business people do not have to fly for every meeting abroad.  Perhaps the Icelandic volcano was fortuitous for climate politics, because without any advocacy from environmentalists, people have found alternative ways for moving, consuming, and conducting business. It is estimated that the grounding of planes has saved about 1.3 million tonnes of CO2 emissions in less than a week (plane emissions minus volcano emissions).  This is not to sideline the frustration of millions of travelers or the loss of millions to the airline industry. But, just before the planes take off again, we should take a moment to think about how this one geological event opened a space of potentiality, and showed us that we can find alternatives to emitting GHGs, if necessary.


NIMBYism and windfarms in Toronto

The City of Toronto was well ahead of the Canadian curve when it came to adopting basic principles of sustainability around public transport, intensification of building density and the need to increase sources of renewable energy. The Ontario Green Energy Act has provided marvelous opportunities for increasing provincial sources of renewable energy. I have been amazed at how wind farms built in recent years in southwestern Ontario and on the way to Grey Bruce have livened up the landscape.

But, as the province moves on from terrestrial wind farms to offshore projects, one Toronto community is mobilizing against them. Some Guildwood residents have asked their city councilors, Paul Ainslie and Brian Ashton, to bring forward a motion to the city’s executive committee asking the province for a blanket-moratorium on wind-power development. The Globe and Mail article, Bluff residents fight wind turbines, explains that this motion, if passed, will be purely symbolic. But, while it will have little impact, it illustrates the nature of local opposition to such projects. The article quotes my colleague, Mark Winfield: "it would be “tragic" if fear of angering residents prevented the city’s politicians from pursuing much-needed renewable energy initiatives."

I am grading final exams right now. Since my head is in this space, my response on hearing about this motion in the last week was to imagine a take-home exam that I would like to set all of the voting residents of this local community. Here are the essay questions:

1. Explain what the acronym NIMBY stands for and discuss how this may or may not be applicable to Guildwood.

2. Define the term “ecological footprint” and explain how you would calculate your personal footprint.

3. In the documentary, The Age of Stupid, the filmmaker, Franny Armstrong illustrates the case of local residents opposing a wind farm project on the basis of landscape aesthetics. Compare and contrast this case with that of Guildwood in terms of how you are still “do[ing] your bit for the environment” (quote from wind-farm opponent in The Age of Stupid).

4. Discuss the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature for the harmful impacts of wind farms on human health and the environment. In your answer, define the term, peer-reviewed literature. (hint - you may want to use Google Scholar for this).

The purpose of these questions? Well, none of them have definitive right or wrong answers, so they are aimed at improving the level of informed opinions on the issue, because, obviously, there is homework that would need to be done to answer these questions. In the Globe article, Mr. Ainslie comments “there’s a lot of things that are unanswered”. These questions would help in addressing his concerns.

And, I am NOT advocating for only peer-reviewed science to drive action and policy. My close colleague,  environmental ethicist, Dr. Nicole Klenk proposes that “scientific narratives should be denied a priori privilege over non-scientific interpretations of nature for policy purposes”. I completely agree – local knowledge is very important and should be taken into account. BUT just how much local knowledge is there about wind farms in Guildwood?

I have lost patience with the dominant notion in our society, that an uninformed opinion should count for as much as an informed opinion. Too many people, including my teenager,  are getting away without doing their homework. The question of exactly whom I see as being responsible for this lamentable state of affairs is a topic for another blog.

Dawn R. Bazely

PS the quote is from the 2008 article, Listening to the birds: a pragmatic proposal for forestry in the peer-reviewed journal, Environmental Values, volume 17, pages 331-351


css.php